U.S. Virgin Islander vs Subsaharan African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Subsaharan African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Sub-Saharan Africans
24.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Subsaharan African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,304,073 people shows no correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,393,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 23.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 5.4% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 51.4% | 60.3% |
Range | 46.0% | 57.5% |
Mean | 25.0% | 23.6% |
Median | 23.5% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.7% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 26.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders and Sub-Saharan Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |