Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,705,487 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 5.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 50.0% |
| Range | 29.7% | 46.6% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 15.1% |
| Median | 12.0% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Potawatomi by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are French American Indian (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |