Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
14.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,725,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 5.0%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 32.8% | 38.3% |
| Range | 30.3% | 36.1% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 15.3% |
| Median | 14.2% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Potawatomi by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Fijian (13.0%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Armenia (13.0%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Albania (13.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants (13.0%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are South American (12.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (12.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Uruguay (12.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Colombian (12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Malaysian (12.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| South Americans | 16.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 12.4% |
| Potawatomi | 14.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 12.9 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.5% |
| Colombians | 10.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 8.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Moroccans | 7.6 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 7.6 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Native Hawaiians | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 6.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Hawaiians | 5.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |