Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,133,326 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 0.32%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 10.0% | 14.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.0% | 85.2% |
Mean | 31.9% | 38.4% |
Median | 25.2% | 27.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 21.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 50.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 28.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 25.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Potawatomi by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Chippewa (18.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 20.0% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 20.1% |