Chickasaw vs Pima Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Pima
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Pima
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Pima Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 69.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Pima |
Minimum | 3.7% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 29.7% | 92.8% |
Mean | 12.7% | 29.5% |
Median | 12.0% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 34.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |