Brazilian vs Mongolian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Mongolian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Mongolians
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Mongolian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,209,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Mongolian |
Minimum | 0.81% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 23.4% |
Range | 19.8% | 22.8% |
Mean | 8.3% | 8.0% |
Median | 7.9% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 10.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Mongolians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |