Brazilian vs Afghan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Afghan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Afghans
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
63.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Afghan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,686,157 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Afghan |
Minimum | 0.81% | 0.91% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 25.6% |
Range | 19.8% | 24.7% |
Mean | 8.3% | 9.5% |
Median | 7.9% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Afghans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |