Argentinean vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Argentinean
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Argentineans
Chickasaw
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,059,037 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 33.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.1% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 56.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.6% | 96.2% |
Mean | 13.3% | 26.8% |
Median | 11.9% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Argentineans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tlingit-Haida (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |