Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Chickasaw
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
78.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,239,456 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 23.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.0% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 55.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.7% | 96.2% |
Mean | 18.0% | 26.8% |
Median | 15.2% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Kuwait (15.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |