Seminole vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Seminole
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Seminole
Chickasaw
21.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,946,646 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 7.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Seminole | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.6% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 72.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 69.4% | 96.2% |
Mean | 25.5% | 26.8% |
Median | 22.2% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |