Argentinean vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Argentinean
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Argentineans
Chickasaw
10.8%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,410,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 21.0%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.50% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 23.9% | 32.8% |
Range | 23.4% | 30.3% |
Mean | 9.1% | 15.0% |
Median | 9.1% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 17.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Argentineans by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Brazil (10.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovak (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Russia (10.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Moldova (10.9%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Jordan | 92.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Yugoslavians | 92.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Israelis | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
French | 92.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.0 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 90.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Argentineans | 90.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Slovaks | 89.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 89.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 88.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.9% |
Hmong | 88.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.9% |
Celtics | 87.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.7 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
Chileans | 86.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |