Alsatian vs Sudanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Sudanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alsatians
Sudanese
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Sudanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,113,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 4.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Sudanese |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 43.0% |
Range | 19.7% | 41.4% |
Mean | 11.5% | 16.5% |
Median | 10.5% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 19.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Sudanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.45%), American (14.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.57%), French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.65%), Cree (15.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |