Alsatian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Immigrants from Western Asia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alsatians
Immigrants from Western Asia
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
20.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,121,163 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 4.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Minimum | 3.4% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 44.7% |
Range | 19.7% | 38.4% |
Mean | 11.5% | 16.2% |
Median | 10.5% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Immigrants from Western Asia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |