French American Indian vs Sudanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Sudanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Sudanese
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Sudanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,968,938 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,113,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.65%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Sudanese |
Minimum | 0.16% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 40.0% | 43.0% |
Range | 39.8% | 41.4% |
Mean | 17.2% | 16.5% |
Median | 16.2% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 19.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Sudanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cree (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |