Alsatian vs Japanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Japanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alsatians
Japanese
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Japanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,060,032 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 0.050%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Japanese |
Minimum | 3.4% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 19.7% | 95.9% |
Mean | 11.5% | 21.0% |
Median | 10.5% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Japanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |