Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Western Asia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Western Asia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Western Asia
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
20.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Western Asia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,121,163 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 3.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Minimum | 0.78% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 69.0% | 44.7% |
Range | 68.2% | 38.4% |
Mean | 21.7% | 16.2% |
Median | 15.9% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Immigrants from Western Asia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (13.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |