Spanish American Indian vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Sub-Saharan Africans
71.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,145,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016 and weighted average of 71.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 14.7%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 37.6% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 90.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.8% | 67.4% |
Mean | 68.5% | 62.5% |
Median | 69.3% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.6% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.1% | 68.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Yup'ik (72.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Tongan (69.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Yakama (69.3%, a difference of 2.7%), Yuman (69.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and Immigrants from Mexico (69.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Yup'ik | 100 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 72.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 71.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 69.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Yuman | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 69.1% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 69.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.8% |
Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |