Immigrants from Liberia vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Sub-Saharan Africans
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,243,454 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 31.5% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 83.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.7% | 67.4% |
Mean | 61.7% | 62.5% |
Median | 62.4% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.3% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.1% | 68.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |