Estonian vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Estonian
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Estonians
Sub-Saharan Africans
62.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,500,742 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 62.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Estonian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 41.3% | 32.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 58.7% | 67.4% |
| Mean | 68.1% | 62.5% |
| Median | 65.9% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.9% | 58.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.0% | 68.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Estonians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are New Zealander (62.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Denmark (62.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Australian (62.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (63.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Yemen (63.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
| West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |