Immigrants from Latvia vs Japanese Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Japanese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Japanese
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Japanese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,726,313 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,074,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 6.3%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Japanese |
| Minimum | 31.9% | 39.1% |
| Maximum | 86.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 54.2% | 60.9% |
| Mean | 61.9% | 66.2% |
| Median | 65.2% | 66.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 55.5% | 60.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 72.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |