Costa Rican vs Japanese Family Households
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Japanese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Costa Ricans
Japanese
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Japanese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,469,677 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,074,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.060%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Japanese |
Minimum | 41.4% | 39.1% |
Maximum | 89.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.2% | 60.9% |
Mean | 68.7% | 66.2% |
Median | 68.7% | 66.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.6% | 60.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 72.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Japanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |