Immigrants from Latvia vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Alaskan Athabascans
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,726,313 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,815,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 61.8%, a difference of 0.26%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 31.9% | 17.8% |
Maximum | 86.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.2% | 82.2% |
Mean | 61.9% | 59.5% |
Median | 65.2% | 59.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 55.5% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 67.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 16.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |