Burmese vs Japanese Family Households
COMPARE
Burmese
Japanese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Burmese
Japanese
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Japanese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,249 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,074,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.22%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Japanese |
Minimum | 35.2% | 39.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 64.8% | 60.9% |
Mean | 70.5% | 66.2% |
Median | 70.3% | 66.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 60.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 72.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Japanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |