Chickasaw vs Ottawa Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ottawa
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Ottawa
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
19.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ottawa Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,944,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 45.8%, a difference of 0.19%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Ottawa |
Minimum | 20.0% | 34.7% |
Maximum | 65.4% | 85.7% |
Range | 45.4% | 51.0% |
Mean | 47.8% | 52.3% |
Median | 48.9% | 50.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.2% | 43.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 58.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 14.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Ottawa by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Carpatho Rusyn (45.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |
Alaska Natives | 13.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 45.6% |
Aleuts | 12.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 45.6% |
Nepalese | 11.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 45.6% |
Uruguayans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 45.5% |