Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kuwait Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Kuwait
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Kuwait
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
25.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kuwait Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,888,250 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 46.0%, a difference of 0.15%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Kuwait |
Minimum | 20.0% | 12.7% |
Maximum | 65.4% | 74.9% |
Range | 45.4% | 62.1% |
Mean | 47.8% | 45.3% |
Median | 48.9% | 47.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.2% | 36.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 51.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 15.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 15.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Choctaw (46.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (46.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |