Chickasaw vs Guatemalan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Guatemalan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Guatemalans
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Guatemalan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,284,876 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 43.3%, a difference of 6.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Guatemalan |
Minimum | 20.0% | 11.2% |
Maximum | 65.4% | 67.5% |
Range | 45.4% | 56.3% |
Mean | 47.8% | 42.0% |
Median | 48.9% | 41.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.2% | 37.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 45.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Yuman (43.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Ethiopian (43.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Nigerian (43.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |