Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,566,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 48.4%, a difference of 5.4%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from China
Minimum	20.0%	26.3%
Maximum	65.4%	73.8%
Range	45.4%	47.4%
Mean	47.8%	51.2%
Median	48.9%	51.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	43.2%	46.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	53.2%	55.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.0%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.7%	8.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.6%	8.6%

Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
South American Indians	28.4 /100 \| #188	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	26.9 /100 \| #189	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	25.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 46.0%
Choctaw	24.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	24.6 /100 \| #192	Fair 46.0%
Taiwanese	23.4 /100 \| #193	Fair 45.9%
Mexican American Indians	23.3 /100 \| #194	Fair 45.9%
Chickasaw	22.7 /100 \| #195	Fair 45.9%
Immigrants \| South America	22.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 45.9%
Cambodians	21.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 45.9%
Ottawa	19.4 /100 \| #198	Poor 45.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	15.7 /100 \| #199	Poor 45.7%
Potawatomi	15.6 /100 \| #200	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Serbia	15.2 /100 \| #201	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Central America	14.2 /100 \| #202	Poor 45.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from North America (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Luxembourgers	99.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 48.5%
Basques	99.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 48.4%
Northern Europeans	99.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.0 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 48.4%
Jordanians	98.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 48.4%
Romanians	98.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	98.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| China	98.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| North America	98.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 48.4%
Laotians	98.8 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 48.4%
Scotch-Irish	98.6 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 48.3%
Immigrants \| Singapore	98.6 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 48.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 48.3%
Immigrants \| England	98.4 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 48.2%
Immigrants \| Fiji	98.4 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 48.2%