Burmese vs Immigrants from Korea Family Households
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Korea
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Korea
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Korea Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,249 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,966,940 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 66.0%, a difference of 0.45%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Korea |
Minimum | 35.2% | 35.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 64.8% | 64.8% |
Mean | 70.5% | 69.4% |
Median | 70.3% | 70.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 63.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 76.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Korea by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |