Immigrants from Norway vs South African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
South African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
South Africans
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs South African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,699,496 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,561,768 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | South African |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 27.3% |
Range | 30.7% | 25.7% |
Mean | 8.2% | 7.3% |
Median | 6.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and South Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |