Immigrants from Norway vs Icelander Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Icelander
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Icelanders
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Icelander Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,699,496 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,692 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.37%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Icelander |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 16.5% |
Range | 30.7% | 16.1% |
Mean | 8.2% | 6.9% |
Median | 6.5% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Icelanders by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |