Immigrants from Norway vs Czech Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Czech
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Czechs
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Czech Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,699,496 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,584,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.88%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Czech |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 32.8% |
Range | 30.7% | 31.6% |
Mean | 8.2% | 7.7% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Czechs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |