Immigrants from Poland vs South African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
South African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
South Africans
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs South African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,808,570 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,561,768 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.28%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | South African |
Minimum | 2.8% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 17.5% | 27.3% |
Range | 14.7% | 25.7% |
Mean | 6.5% | 7.3% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and South Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |