Sri Lankan vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Sri Lankans
Chickasaw
47.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,506,479 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 47.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 25.0% | 27.5% |
Maximum | 70.1% | 68.4% |
Range | 45.1% | 40.9% |
Mean | 47.1% | 48.9% |
Median | 47.2% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.4% | 45.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.2% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Iraq (47.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (47.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (47.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Afghan (47.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Jordan (47.4%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Osage | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 47.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 87.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
Laotians | 86.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
Okinawans | 85.3 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 84.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.4% |
New Zealanders | 84.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.4% |
Portuguese | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
Sri Lankans | 83.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 82.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Australia | 81.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.7 /100 | #135 | Good 47.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 78.2 /100 | #136 | Good 47.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |