Iroquois vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,291,130 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 48.6 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $42,581, a difference of 16.0%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $79,563, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $76,903, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,907, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $51,719, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $79,358, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 117.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 49.9%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 61.9%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 33.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 4.2%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.30, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.5%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.9%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.2%).