Bhutanese vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bhutanese
Chinese
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Bhutanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,722,313 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 33.1 Chinese.
Bhutanese vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $56,872, a difference of 8.6%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $77,465, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.4%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $98,496, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $58,162, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Bhutanese | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,894 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,800 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $100,151 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,297 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,759 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,648 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,078 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $109,520 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $117,750 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $72,288 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Average 25.9% |
Bhutanese vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Poverty Metric | Bhutanese | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Bhutanese vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Bhutanese | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bhutanese | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Bhutanese vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (48.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Bhutanese | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.3% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Excellent 30.2% |
Bhutanese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bhutanese | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.1% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Bhutanese vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.5%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.3%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Bhutanese | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.7% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Bhutanese vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.7%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Disability Metric | Bhutanese | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |