Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Chinese
8,214
SOCIAL INDEX
79.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
82nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Eastern Europe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,416,642 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Chinese.
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.6%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $56,872, a difference of 7.2%), and per capita income ($49,316 compared to $46,098, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.38%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($112,527 compared to $116,188, a difference of 3.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,316 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,527 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,051 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,624 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,958 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,309 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,572 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,662 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,335 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,693 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 38.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 33.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.9% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households (64.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.98%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 65.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 62.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.7% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.8%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Good 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.8%), male disability (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.41%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |