Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Oceania
9.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,718,200 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,786,769 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 3.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.88% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 17.7% |
Range | 37.7% | 16.7% |
Mean | 11.3% | 9.3% |
Median | 9.5% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Immigrants from Oceania by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Japanese (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Navajo (9.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%), Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |