Chilean vs Immigrants from Oceania No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chilean
Immigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Oceania
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Oceania No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,786,769 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 1.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 18.4% | 17.7% |
Range | 16.7% | 16.7% |
Mean | 7.6% | 9.3% |
Median | 7.5% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Oceania by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |