Chippewa vs Immigrants from South Africa No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from South Africa
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from South Africa
9.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from South Africa No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,718,200 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,945,081 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.620 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 3.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 0.88% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.7% | 98.5% |
Mean | 11.3% | 9.7% |
Median | 9.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 7.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 18.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Immigrants from South Africa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Japanese (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%), Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.66%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and Puget Sound Salish (9.5%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.65%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |