Chilean vs Colombian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chilean
Colombian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chileans
Colombians
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Colombian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,339,443 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colombians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Colombian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 18.4% | 31.4% |
Range | 16.7% | 30.0% |
Mean | 7.6% | 10.5% |
Median | 7.5% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Colombians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |