Zimbabwean vs Tongan Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Tongan
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Zimbabweans
Tongans
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,670 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,835,812 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 2.2%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Tongan |
Minimum | 0.60% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 14.9% | 25.4% |
Range | 14.3% | 24.7% |
Mean | 8.1% | 10.4% |
Median | 8.1% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Tongans by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Turkish (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.070%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from South Africa (9.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (9.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Lithuanian (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (9.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Russian (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Australians | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Russians | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Lithuanians | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Asians | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.7% |