Zimbabwean vs Luxembourger Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Luxembourger
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Zimbabweans
Luxembourgers
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Luxembourger Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,670 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,526,649 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 9.1%, a difference of 3.8%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 14.9% | 13.6% |
| Range | 14.3% | 13.1% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 6.0% |
| Median | 8.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Luxembourgers by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Turkish (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.070%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (9.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |