Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Australia Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Australia
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Australia
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Australia Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,670 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,603,605 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 3.5%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Australia |
Minimum | 0.60% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 14.9% | 22.9% |
Range | 14.3% | 22.3% |
Mean | 8.1% | 9.4% |
Median | 8.1% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Australia by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Turkish (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.070%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (9.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Luxembourger (9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |