Zimbabwean vs Slovene Male Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Slovene
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Slovenes
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Slovene Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,189,705 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 2.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Slovene |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.61% |
Maximum | 18.8% | 46.7% |
Range | 17.7% | 46.1% |
Mean | 8.1% | 11.1% |
Median | 8.3% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Slovenes by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Asian (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |