Zimbabwean vs Ukrainian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Ukrainian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Ukrainians
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
MALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Ukrainian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,972,433 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.759 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.45%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Ukrainian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 18.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 17.7% | 95.8% |
Mean | 8.1% | 18.1% |
Median | 8.3% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 19.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 20.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Ukrainians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Austrian (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scandinavian (10.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |