Zimbabwean vs Slovene Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Slovene
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Slovenes
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Slovene Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,900,549 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 3.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Slovene |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 59.7% | 67.0% |
| Range | 58.6% | 61.1% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 22.9% |
| Median | 18.6% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |