Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
64.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,423,008 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 24.6% |
Range | 25.6% | 23.7% |
Mean | 9.3% | 9.8% |
Median | 8.9% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |