Yugoslavian vs Chilean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Chilean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Chileans
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Chilean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,512,426 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.95%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Chilean |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 36.4% |
Range | 25.6% | 35.6% |
Mean | 9.3% | 10.5% |
Median | 8.9% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Chileans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Peru (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Puget Sound Salish (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |