Yugoslavian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Guamanian/Chamorro
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Guamanians/Chamorros
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
67.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,842,342 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 40.6% |
Range | 25.6% | 39.9% |
Mean | 9.3% | 12.3% |
Median | 8.9% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Guamanians/Chamorros by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |