White/Caucasian vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Czechoslovakians
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
48.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,435,427 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.882 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 7.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 11.8% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 46.2% | 54.7% |
Range | 34.4% | 51.9% |
Mean | 21.3% | 24.4% |
Median | 21.2% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 32.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Ethiopian (16.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Scotch-Irish (16.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Syria (16.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Uruguayan (16.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 53.6 /100 | #169 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.7 /100 | #170 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 51.3 /100 | #171 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Uruguayans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 49.0 /100 | #175 | Average 16.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 48.2 /100 | #176 | Average 16.5% |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |